Seagate ironwolf failure rate B 2 Annualized Failure Rate (AFR)* 0. K 8 2. 1 About the Serial ATA interface The Serial ATA interface provides several advantages over the traditional (parallel) ATA interface. The latest capacity of the Seagate IronWolf Pro line is a solid addition to the company’s Guardian Series. The Seagate 1TB disks that we did get ( new ) had a 50% failure rate - and I'd have to test the 'factory refurbished' drives we got as replacements under RMA because they'd often fail right out of the box. WD takes forever, and doesn't offer advanced replacement. I think the third drive is started to have a strange scratching noise today. Their highest failure rate drives last year were Seagate. Feb 25, 2018 · That type of failure rate is troubling for any product, especially if it holds irreplaceable data. 8TB Seagate Ironwolf thoughts? Looks like the ST8000 series is pretty reliable with a long term failure rate of around 1. com Introduction 1. In this post, MiniTool Partition Wizard shows you Seagate IronWolf vs WD Red specifications and lists some factors you should take into consideration when purchasing a NAS drive. H Gen. Annualized Failure Rate (AFR) of 0. By far the highest failure rates we have ever seen are Western Due to a few bad experiences lately with WD I would like to get two of these: Seagate IronWolf 12TB Mod # ST12000VN0008. This failure rate may not seem horrible; however, consider the other Seagate failure rates. 62 per cent, which compares to Toshiba at 1. The failure rates for the SSDs are analyzed in the SSD Edition: 2023 Drive Stats review. This gives users a peace of mind that the new Seagate drive will be able to handle multiple users continuously uploading and downloading data to the NAS server. 100844774, Rev. Aug 12, 2019 · Conclusion. 26%. And they can be one of your next disks. 35% based on 8760 POH Maximum Rated Workload* Maximum rate of <550TB/year May 1, 2021 · All 4 drives are in Raid 10 and have around 740 hours of powered on time. F 6 2. Are these values normal? The Raw_Error_Rate and Seek_Error_Rate are continuing to increase. B 4 Annualized Failure Rate (AFR)* 0. I know it's a bit of a necromancing act. 5-inch HDD) at Amazon for $249. G Gen. The highest failure rate this quarter is actually from a HGST - aka WD drive BTW, and it's well over 20% failure rate. A 6 www. Oct 25, 2017 · Seagate has designed the IronWolf 12TB to handle a workload rate of 180TB/year with an MTBF rating of 1 million hours. Seagate IronWolf Pro Serial ATA Product Manual, Rev. Mar 14, 2018 · Seagate IronWolf Pro 12TB (Black) at Amazon for $292. 45% one year ago (6/30/2021). Feel kind of burned by Seagate since this issue seems long standing. On the NAS front, Seagate has taken both its IronWolf and IronWolf Pro and expanded the capacity up to 12TB per drive. Enterprise disks like the Ultrastar and Exos idle at about 5-6W and active load max out at 9-10W. Any drive longevity and/or failure issues, warranty and/or replacement issues, and recommendations? Planning to upgrade drives for QNAP 1U 4 bay server and Synology DS1618+ Also, if you purchase a multi-drive NAS, buy your drives a few months apart or from different distributors so you reduce your chance of getting drives from the same lot. 27% and 5. After replacing the Seagate with an identical spare, no data loss from the RAID array. 87% based on 8760 POH Maximum Rated Workload * Maximum rate of <180TB/year Seagate IronWolf Serial ATA Product Manual, Rev. The issue is hit or miss, though. 11%) was the 6TB Seagate, which is impressive given that this model is also the oldest in Backblaze’s fleet (boasting an average age of Seagate is no longer using the industry standard "Mean Time Between Failures" (MTBF) to quantify disk drive average failure rates. Annualized Failure Rate (AFR)* 0. 89 71-TiB NAS with twenty-four 4TB drives hasn't had a single drive failure for ten years — owner outlines key approaches to assure HDD Seagate IronWolf SATA Product Manual, Rev. ” Seagate’s overall average AFR across its drives is 1. And that 6. 68 percent in 2022. Nov 14, 2023 · Of that number, 4,459 are boot drives, with 3,242 being SSDs and 1,217 being HDDs. Mar 14, 2018 · Seagate IronWolf Pro 12TB (3. G 6 www. We would like to show you a description here but the site won’t allow us. You should also look into RAID levels vs capacity and the expected rebuild failure rate. Also, the Seagate has seemed pretty loud (which is why I investigated the write cache in the first place). The Ironwolf health and SMART tests always show Green and healthy. 87% based on 8760 POH Maximum Rated Workload* Maximum rate of <180TB/year. MTBF has proven useful in the past, but it is flawed. B 6 www. May 4, 2023 · Of that number, 4,400 are boot drives, with 3,038 SSDs and 1,362 HDDs. The failure rates for the SSDs are analyzed in the SSD Edition: 2022 Drive Stats review. Optimized for NAS with AgileArrayTM, enabling the most advanced power management possible. D Gen 2 - April 2020 Standard 512E model ST14000VN0008 ST12000VN0008 ST10000VN0008 SATA Product Manual Oct 25, 2017 · Seagate has expanded its Guardian Series of HDDs with even higher capacity version. The Annualized Workload Rate is in units of TB per year, or TB per 8760 power on hours. Sep 16, 2020 · I use Seagate Ironwolf 10-12TB drives, had no problems for 2 years so far in two QNAP's 8 bays. Before use a LaCie Big and that failed after 5 yrs. 38% annual failure rate across all of their drive models tested, while WD came in at 1. Fake labels refurb drives BARRACUDAS! So no wonder the failure rate is high from certain resellers. 8% (not bad). Seagate leads the competition with the highest-performing NAS drive portfolio. First 12 months failure rate can easily be someone dropped a try of HDD and they fail within a few week. Seagate IronWolf Pro SATA Product Manual, Rev. Seagate IronWolf SATA Product Manual, Rev. 87% based on 8760 POH Rated Workload Maximum rate of <180TB/year Seagate IronWolf Serial ATA Product Manual, Rev. SeaTools is more consistent and more accurate and is the standard Seagate uses to determine hard drive failure. Also, despite BackBlaze's data on 0% failure rates with some Seagates in their quarterly reports--every single Seagate drive I've ever owned has failed (usually in < six months). Does Seagate still have such a high failure rate ? Since ~2016, when Seagate stopped selling the bad drives based on new technology, Seagate (WD and Toshiba) have shipped hundreds of millions of drives, none of which have a record of unusually high failures when used as intended. Seagate should have went out of business for those failures on something that should never fail. I swore off it forever Over the years of watching this with pretty much EXACTLY the same information anybody inside or outside Backblaze has available, we've seen two things: The particular drive model can have a pretty drastic effect on failure rates. Seagate IronWolf Pro SATA +Rescue Product Manual, Rev. Then suddenly nothing sticks. Unless otherwise noted, all spec ifications are measured under a mbient conditions, at 25°C, and nominal power. A quick glance down the annualized failure rate (AFR) column identifies the three drives with the highest failure rates: The 8TB HGST (model: HUH728080ALE604) at 6. Let’s see if that holds true for the lifetime failure rate of our drives. Seagate is fine is you are running RAID with spare drives sitting around to hot swap the installed ones as they fail. 5 months) hard drive Backblaze tested was a 6TB Seagate (ST6000DX000). 39%. Backblaze measured the reliability of the drives based on their annual failure rate, which is the average number of failures while running a drive for one year. Other brands don't seem to have the same effect. And WD would have the lowest typical failure rates. Today my NAS is 82% full, it looks time to expand my storage I was checking for the Seagate IronWolf 16 TB, maybe due to the Seagate's marketing I checked the last Backblaze report. 70%, respectively. 0 Drive specifications Unless otherwise noted, all spec ifications are measured under a mbient conditions, at 25°C, and nominal power. 11% failure rate in 5 years. To address issues of reliability, Seagate is changing to another standard: "Annualized Failure Rate" (AFR). The messed up part is all of the Seagate drives in my server are significantly newer than my WD drives… I had a Seagate Ironwolf fail so bad recently that the system wouldn’t post with it attached. 0 Drive Specifications Unless otherwise noted, all specifications are measured under ambient conditions, at 25°C, and nominal power. Seagate IronWolf Pro v4 Serial ATA Product Manual, Rev. 445 per Jun 17, 2023 · The IronWolf Pro also has an MTBF rating of 2. Feb 13, 2024 · But, not all drive models play along. E 8 2. That said, Seagate makes RMA quick and painless. but I just got fake Seagate IronWolf drives from a Chinese reseller. 29% you are showing is well within 12 months. 5 million hours, a workload rate of up to 550TB per year, and an annualized failure rate (AFR) of 0. That leaves us with 259,533 HDDs that we’ll focus on in this report. Designed for up to 8 bays and featuring 3TB and speeds of up to 180MB/s, these internal hard drives are specifically built for less wear and tear, little to no noise/vibration, no lags or down time, increased file-sharing performance, and lower power consumption. Although the IronWolf Pro Series can be used as a single drive, they excel in a RAID Network Attached Storage (NAS) environment up to a 24-bay solution. Get whatever’s cheaper IMO. 73%. The IronWolf Pro is designed specifically for use in NAS devices and is aimed toward creative professionals, SOHO, and SME markets. Pull up the data sheets. I just had the second drive have a SMART failure and (very easy and nice) RMA by Seagate after less than a year. That is, not using non-Enterprise drives in a Enterprise environment. 73% based on 8760 POH Maximum Rated Workload* Maximum rate of <300TB/year Workloads exceeding the annualized rate may degrade the drive MTBF and impact product reli-ability. 2 million, and a workload rating of 550TB per Seagate IronWolf Product Manual, Rev. Feb 1, 2022 · Across the year, the model with the lowest failure rate (0. 87% based on 8760 POH Maximum Rated Workload* Maximum rate of <180TB/year Seagate IronWolf Serial ATA Product Manual, Rev. Jan 31, 2023 · We looked at this in our Q3 2022 Drive Stats report, and outlined the trade-offs between drive cost and failure rates. OFC this is just as disingenous as your claim. Specifications 4TB 2TB Standard Model Number ST4000NT001 ST2000NT001 Interface SATA 6Gb/s SATA 6Gb/s Features Drive Bays Supported Unlimited Unlimited Dec 6, 2016 · Backblaze's claim of 2016 QTR 3; which includes the period between 07/01/2016 and 09/01/2016, indicates that the Seagate 8TB HDD ST800DM002 had a 1. D 6. Its AFR was 0. 1 - 1. Feb 2, 2022 · Backblaze’s data does not suggest an AFR of 30-50% or anywhere near that. 27% Its mean time before failure (MTBF) is rated at 1,000,000 hours, with a 180TB per year workload rate limit. What's the best NAS HDD - Seagate IronWolf Pro versus WD Red Pro. 2. Seagate really needed that data recovery service included for people to even try their products again. Mar 3, 2024 · The Seagate IronWolf Pro Network Attached Storage (NAS) Drive comes in a range of storage sizes from 4TB to 18TB, running at 7200 RPM. Apr 7, 2021 · As visible from the below graph, the Seagate 6TB drive (model: ST6000DX000) has the lowest annualized failure rate of just 0. I was about to order them from Amazon (I don’t do Newegg or E-Bay) at a cost of $305 each. And that is still true after applying a janky fix from Seagate. In terms of warranty, Seagate offers 1-5 years depending on the product line, while WD ranges from 1-5 years as well. 35% Contemplating if I should go with the WD Red Pro 10 TB or the Seagate IronWolf 12 TB, which apparently doesn't suffer from this issue. 87% based on 8760 POH Maximum Rated Workload* Maximum rate of <180TB/year Jan 31, 2023 · At first sight, the HGST Ultrastar He8 8TB (HUH728080ALE604) and Seagate Exos X14 14TB (ST14000NM0138) have the highest failure rates at 5. Beyond 3 years failure rate pretty much across the board starts to escalate rapidly (source: I read it on back blaze a few years ago). Seagate IronWolf Serial ATA Product Manual, Rev. Backblaze also released data and seems to consistently get high failure rates on specific models of Seagate drives each year. Simple as that. The 6TB Seagate drives are over 8. 73% based on 8760 POH Maximum Rated Workload* Maximum rate of <300TB/year Workloads exceeding the annualized rate may degrade the drive MTBF and impact product reliability. 46% failure rate over 5120 drives. Now Seagate has the lowest failure rates while WD has the highest. B 6 2. Both are $369. Feb 1, 2023 · The oldest (average age of 92. 45%. F 6 www. A 2 Annualized Failure Rate (AFR)* 0. Some models are good and some are really bad with >10% failure rates per year. 99 71-TiB NAS with twenty-four 4TB drives hasn't had a single drive failure for ten years — owner outlines key approaches to For example, Backblaze found that the specific models of the Seagate 6TB, HSGT 12TB, and WDC 16TB, have had a 0 percent failure rate in 2021 – which is quite impressive. 10 May 2019 Standard 512E model ST8000NE001 ST6000NE000 ST4000NE001 SATA Product Manual Feb 25, 2018 · 先前文章不斷有提到 NAS 專用硬碟大多是以 7X24（連續一週七天二十四小時）不間斷運作為設計目標，因此像是 Seagate Ironwolf 這類專為 NAS 所設計的硬碟，不僅在 MTBF（平均失效間隔時間）、AFR（年失效率）等數值上遠高於一般家用硬碟，同時也會針對多硬碟陣列長時間運作等用途做特別的優化，例如 Seagate IronWolf Serial ATA Product Manual, Rev. 23%, with HGST’s 4TB drive (model: HMS5C4040ALE640), 4TB drive (model: HMS5C4040BLE640), 8TB drive (model: HUH728080ALE600) and 12TB drive (model: HUH721212ALE600) not far behind with annualized failure rates of 0. From the data that backblaze published the failure rates for most mainstream drive companies drives are pretty similar. In particular with the seek… I’ve been using seagate drives for 5 years now without issues (26 drives total). They care about profits. The Seagate IronWolf 12TB and 10TB appear to be overbuilt Seagate IronWolf Pro SATA Product Manual, Rev. Jul 18, 2018 · SMART Attributes Data Structure revision number: 10 Vendor Specific SMART Attributes with Thresholds: ID# ATTRIBUTE_NAME FLAG VALUE WORST THRESH TYPE UPDATED WHEN_FAILED RAW_VALUE 1 Raw_Read_Error_Rate 0x000f 100 100 006 Pre-fail Always - 757576 3 Spin_Up_Time 0x0003 096 096 000 Pre-fail Always - 0 4 Start_Stop_Count 0x0032 100 100 020 Old_age Oct 1, 2023 · Seagate had an overall 1. Built Tough IronWolf Pro drives are rated for up to 550TB/year workload rate, allowing Seagate IronWolf Pro Serial ATA Product Manual, Rev. If you google "Backblaze hard drive stats", you will see stats showing failure rates for different models and brands of drives. Jan 24, 2022 · ASRock EP2602 Intel Xeon E5-2690 (x2) HP 712383-081 (x8) Seagate Ironwolf 6TB (x8) connected to LSI 9207-8i (not sure if genuine) da0: Nov 2, 2021 · As noted, both Seagate and Dell were looking into the possible causes for the unexpected failure rate. I recently bought a Seagate Ironwolf Pro Recertified drive (ST18000nt001), and the SMART results are worrying me a bit. Use preclear! Documentation. . We can conclude that reliability and failure disk rates depend on the disk models and their running environment. But, their failure rates are typically not high enough to make them less cost effective over their in the last 15 years my failure rate with Seagate is 100% (5 hdd). seagate. 1. NAS drives like the WD Red Pro and Seagate Ironwolf Pro idle at about 4-5W and peak at about 7-8W, with the Red Pros using about 1W less than the Ironwolf Pro's at least on paper. Aug 30, 2016 · The quoted maximum sustained data rate for the 10TB IronWolf is 210MB/s and Seagate back the drive with a three-year warranty. NAS. This is after 3 years of usage. 5 million hours compared to IronWolf's 1. Data is important, and Seagate doesn't care about that importance. At the same time, it is notable that we had several users anecdotally remember the drives as ones with higher failure rates, we saw a strange failure, and Backblaze has these drives as high-failure rate devices. C Gen. 134 per cent, the old HGST (now WD) at 0. After 2 years, the failure rate of this disk base on Backblaze is 0. 11 percent in 2021 and 0. Up to 20TB Broad range of high-performance capacity options to deliver scalable and cost-efficient storage solutions. 73% based on 8760 POH Maximum Rated Workload* Maximum rate of <300TB/year Nov 9, 2021 · I remember Seagate drives having higher failure rates than both Toshiba and WD. Seagate includes a limited 3-year Data Recovery Service that helps you retrieve damaged data in the event of a mechanical error, accident, or natural disaster, and overall protection is provided Do not listen to HTWingnut, YEAR AFTER YEAR, seagate has the highest failure rates at the server grade level. With a 90% success rate of in-house recovery, Seagate has your back with a 2-year included Rescue Data Recovery plan. E 6 2. Despite BackBlaze's data, in my experience, I have a high rate of failure with every large HDD I've ever owned. To the left you can see how each of the three brands did. 35% 0. Compared to the IronWolf Pro, the Pro version supports up to sixteen concurrent drives, MTBF rated at 1,200,000 hours, and 300TB per year workload rate limit. 87% based on 8760 POH Maximum Rated Workload* Maximum rate of <180TB/year I am using a Synology DS1520+ containing 5x Seagate Ironwolf 8 TB (ST8000VN004). Some specific models, like the Seagate IronWolf 18TB, performed exceptionally well with a 0% failure rate. I picked these disks based on the Backblaze report in 2017. 10 March 2020 Standard 512E model ST8000NE001 ST6000NE000 ST4000NE001 SATA Product Manual Jul 6, 2023 · When choosing a NAS drive, some people may not know how to choose between Seagate IronWolf and WD Red. R 2 Contents Annualized Failure Rate (AFR)* 0. P 2 Contents Annualized Failure Rate (AFR)* 0. 87% based on 8760 POH Maximum Rated Workload* Maximum rate of <180TB/year All-CMR Portfolio All IronWolf Pro drives utilize conventional magnetic recording (CMR) technology for consistent, best-in-class NAS performance. This will reduce the chance that your drives will fail at the same time. 35%. For SOHO use I am happy to keep HDDs for more than 5 years. C 4 Annualized Failure Rate (AFR) * 0. Meanwhile 6TB wds are huge piece of shit shown in old stats and from personal experience too. 3 IronWolf Pro comes with extra peace of mind for any mechanical, accidental, or natural disaster. Mar 7, 2023 · Over the last 10 years I have had only hard drive failure - a 10TB Seagate Ironwolf, about 3 years old. The limited number of failures, 26 this quarter, have made failure analysis challenging. For example, in general, Seagate drives are less expensive and their failure rates are typically higher in our environment. We’ll review the quarterly and lifetime failure rates of the data drives as of the end of Q3 2023. A (Draft 4) 6 2. Seagate IronWolf Product Manual, Rev. 6 years old on average and, for 2023, have the lowest AFR for any drive size group potentially making a mockery of the age-is-related-to-failure theory, at least over the last year. 35% based on 8760 POH Maximum Rated Workload* Maximum rate of <550TB/year 6TB iron wolf - ST6000DX000 6TB wd red - WD60EFRX hell you can see those 6TB seagates still even in this backblaze stats, with their 0. 100835908, Rev. Seagate 24TB Ironwolf Pro NAS Hard Drive Review - Seagate IronWolf - Toshiba N300. That is the same as last quarter and down from 1. All of this was bought new around christmas last year. Pre-Failure: Imminent loss of data is being predicted; Please remember that these third-party programs do not have proprietary access to Seagate hard disk information, and therefore often provide inconsistent and inaccurate results. Today, we’ll focus on the 237,278 data drives under management as we review their quarterly and lifetime failure rates as of the end of Q1 2023. 87% based on 8760 POH Rated Workload Maximum rate of <180TB/year The most attention was given to the top 3 in the industry, Hitachi, Western Digital, and Seagate. 2 Seagate® Rescue Data Recovery. FYI, there are 8,760 hours in a year, so these drives are supposed to only be powered-up 27% of the time, or roughly an eight-hour shift per weekday (plus some change), which is Feb 6, 2025 · Just this year two of my Seagate iron wolf drives died - the model number is ST4000VNZ08. Seagate IronWolf +Rescue 18TB 512E - Product Manual; IronWolf Pro + Rescue 20TB - 512E SATA Product Manual; IronWolf +Rescue (1-4TB, 6TB & 8TB) Product Manual If you keep reading, they are seeing higher than average failure rates on newer Seagate models. Those 2-TB Seagate HDDs for less than $50 at Microcenter, for instance, are only rated 2,400 power-on hours per year (!), and have a workload rate limit of 55 TB/year. This NAS-specific drive gives users the highest capacity possible at relatively inexpensive price tag, while results from our performance charts reaffirm that the line is a good choice for SOHO, SME markets and creative professionals. That was only a few years ago. The serial number register fine until you contact Customer Support and ask them to check all the numbers. The IronWolf Pro series enables tough, ready and scalable 24x7 performance that can handle multi-drive environments across a wide range of capacities. Another equivalent drive would be the 4TB WD Red Plus. 3 years is the approximate expected lifetime for a hard drive, pretty much across the board. The ST4000DX000 4TB drive had a 10. Oct 11, 2022 · Due to how these drives are segmented, the Exos X20 has a higher mean time before failure (MTBF) rating of 2. No failures of WD NAS drives, ever. If you have seen STH reviews and noticed that we use Seagate Exos X12’s as props in many reviews, it is because we saw a high failure rate like Backblaze did with the drives. Feb 13, 2024 · That seems to have opened a dialog between Seagate and Backblaze and changed the drives that Backblaze uses. 20% failure rate over 192 drives. Aug 2, 2022 · The lifetime annualized failure rate for all the drives listed above is 1. Even the author describes the variations described in his Annualized Failure Rate chart as a " Seagate IronWolf Serial ATA Product Manual, Rev. Purpose built for multi-user NAS environments, IronWolf is perfect for teams needing to store more and work faster. 0 Drive specifications. 10 March 2021 Standard 512E model ST8000NE001 ST6000NE000 ST4000NE001 SATA Product Manual Seagate IronWolf Pro 20TB Seagate Exos X20 20TB WD Red Pro 20TB; Spindle speed (RPM) 7200 7200 Annualized Failure Rate (AFR) 0. 3%. mxaz faxotih oll rppzq vyzp eivrn xjdodtt bliwgu lebqs dgb dwuvpg rcbpl jrqdvhc fjnz bhuq